Anthropic Just Dropped Ultra Plan for Claude Code
π Description
Ray Amjad reviews Claude Codeβs new /ultraplan command β a feature that offloads planning to a web-based Claude Code session. After running 10 Ultra Plans vs 10 local plans, he discovers that Ultra Plan secretly has 3 different planning modes assigned server-side, making it essentially an A/B/C test. The deep plan mode uses 4 sub-agents with a critique pass and is genuinely better for complex cross-app changes, but users have no control over which mode they receive. He recommends extracting the deep plan prompt and using it as a standalone custom skill instead.
Channel: Ray Amjad URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNhA17l6CWw
π― Learning Objectives
By the end of this video, you will understand:
- How the
/ultraplancommand works and what the web-based planning UI offers - The 3 hidden planning modes inside Ultra Plan (simple, visual, deep/multi-agent)
- When Ultra Plan genuinely outperforms local planning vs when itβs equivalent
- How Anthropic uses server-side A/B/C testing to evaluate planning prompts
- How to extract and repurpose the deep plan system prompt as a custom skill
π Curriculum/Contents
- ~0:00 β Introduction: what Ultra Plan is and why you might be underwhelmed
- ~0:30 β Demo: running
/ultraplanin Claude Code, getting session URL - ~1:00 β Web UI walkthrough: inline comments, thumbs up/down, approve plan
- ~1:45 β Teleport options: run on cloud vs teleport back to terminal
- ~2:30 β Benchmark results: 10 Ultra Plans vs 10 local plans, key differences
- ~3:30 β Discovery: 3 hidden planning modes found via binary string analysis
- Simple plan (same as local)
- Visual plan (adds ASCII + Mermaid diagrams)
- Deep plan / βfree subagents with critiqueβ (multi-agent exploration)
- ~4:30 β Deep plan architecture: 4 sub-agents (code understanding, file identification, risk analysis, critique)
- ~5:00 β A/B/C testing revelation: Anthropic controls assignment via remote config
- ~5:45 β Hypothesis: Anthropic measuring plan acceptance rates to benchmark prompts and future models
- ~6:15 β Use cases where Ultra Plan excels: blast radius analysis, dependency upgrades
- ~6:45 β Recommendation: extract deep plan prompt as standalone custom skill (link in description)
- ~7:20 β Summary: Ultra Plan is faster and better for multitasking, but mode assignment is opaque
π Notes & Key Takeaways
Main Insights
- Ultra Plan is an A/B/C test in disguise β Anthropic assigns one of 3 planning modes server-side; users have zero visibility or control over which they receive
- Deep plan = multi-agent + critique: 4 sub-agents handle code understanding, file discovery, risk identification, and a final critique pass β this is meaningfully better for complex tasks
- Consistently 2x faster than local plan across all 10 test runs, likely due to cloud compute
- Better for blast radius analysis: caught more issues when migrating tRPC v10βv11; outperformed local plan on cross-app changes
- Not always better: for simpler isolated changes (e.g., swapping one model for another), Ultra Plan provided no advantage over local planning
- Mermaid/ASCII diagrams appear when assigned to the visual plan variant β their presence/absence now has an explanation
Actionable Points
- Use
/ultraplanfor complex dependency upgrades or multi-file refactors where blast radius matters - Leave inline comments on the web plan UI before approving β this refines the plan before execution
- Extract the deep plan system prompt from Claude Code binary strings and deploy it as a custom
/deepplanskill (Ray shares this in description) - When evaluating Ultra Plan output, consider you may have received the simple or visual variant β if the plan looks mid, itβs not necessarily Ultra Planβs ceiling
- Use Ultra Plan for multitasking: fire off several plans simultaneously, review async in web UI
Personal Reflections
Add your own notes here after watching
β Rating & Review
After completion:
- Quality (1-5): _/5
- Relevance (1-5): _/5
- Would recommend: Yes / No
- Best for: Claude Code power users who want to understand whatβs happening under the hood with Ultra Plan, and practitioners looking to replicate the deep plan behavior as a custom skill
π·οΈ Auto-Generated Tags
Content Analysis:
- Type:
video(YouTube content) - Topics: AI, Claude, tools, development, productivity
- Complexity: Intermediate β assumes familiarity with Claude Code; some binary/reverse-engineering context is advanced
- Priority: Medium β Ultra Plan is genuinely useful but still experimental; extracting the deep plan prompt is the most durable takeaway
Why These Tags:
AI+Claudeβ core subject is a Claude Code featuretoolsβ evaluates a specific tool feature and workflowdevelopmentβ relevant to software development workflows using AI assistantsproductivityβ faster planning and multitasking anglestechnicalβ includes binary string analysis and system prompt inspectionactionableβ concrete recommendation: extract deep plan prompt as custom skill
Suggested Bases Filters:
- Find similar content:
type = video AND tags contains "Claude" - Find high-priority learning:
priority = high AND status = inbox
π Related Topics & Further Research
Related Searches:
- Claude Code planning mode comparison (local vs Ultra)
- Multi-agent critique patterns for software planning
- Claude Code custom skills and system prompts
- A/B testing in AI product development
- tRPC v10 β v11 migration (referenced as test case)
Captured: 2026-04-08 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNhA17l6CWw Channel: Ray Amjad
Connection to Other Notes:
- Related to Claude Code features and workflow optimization
- The deep plan prompt extraction connects to custom skills development (kf-claude, kf-cli)
